Oral Presentation 51st International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine Annual Meeting 2025

The Effect of Lumbar Decompression on Patients’ Disability Measured by Spine Specific Wearables (#MP-6b)

Ram Haddas 1 , Ashley Lynn Rogerson 1 , Yair Barzilay 2 , Kade Kaufmann 1 , Addisu Mesfin 3 , Varun Puvanesarajah 1 , Paul Rubery 1
  1. University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
  2. Spine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Iarael
  3. MedStar Health, Washington, DC

Introduction: Lumbar decompression for radiculopathy secondary to nerve root compression is a common procedure, leading to improvement in function in the appropriately selected patient.1 Continuous, remote objective measurement of patients’ function offers a novel approach for characterizing disability and surgical outcomes.2-5 We describe and validate a spine-specific wearable system to capture trunk kinematics, spatiotemporal parameters, and type of activity in the post-operative patient.2 Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the effect of lumbar decompression and fusion on patient’s disability utilizing spine specific wearables.

Methods: Patients underwent lumbar spine decompression with fusion. A week before (Pre) and 3 month following surgery (Post3), spine specific wearables were attached to patient’s base of neck and passively recorded disability and functional outcomes for 3 days. At the end of each day, ODI and PROMIS were answered by patients. Repeated-measurements ANOVA was used to compare outcomes before and after surgery using SPSS (IBM 2023). 

Results: Disability and function were improved following lumbar decompression and fusion as cited by spine-specific wearables and PROMIS. The volume of activities was significantly increased following surgery (% of the day; walking Pre: 16.0±9.1 vs Post3: 24±8.7, p<0.05;). Moreover, trunk RoM was increased (Sagittal: Pre: 30.4±11.3 vs Post3: 45.2±15.6⸰, p<0.05, Coronal: Pre: 30.0±12.9 vs Post3: 45.4±12.9⸰, p<0.05). Furthermore, PROMIS and ODI scores were significantly improved (PROMIS Physical Function: Pre: 71.1±9.7 vs Post3: 58.5±12.4, p<0.05; PROMIS Pain Interference: Pre: 69.4±11.4 vs Post3: 56.7±10.1, p<0.05; PROMIS Mood: Pre: 65.9±4.0 vs Post3: 60.1±7.7, p<0.05; ODI: Pre: 45.9±12.7 vs Post3: 32.3±11.7, p<0.05;).  Although, DFOMs were improved in LD patients, they were still significantly different from an age and gender matched controls (p>0.05). LD patients presented with lower free-living physical function along with reduced trunk kinematics (walking: 4.7±2.1%, standing: 11.6±3.6%, sitting: 25.3±12.8%, and laying down: 41.7±12.2% of the day, trunk flexion: 15.8±6.7°) at their home-based environment in comparison to controls (walking: 8.9±2.1%, standing: 19.1±4.9%, sitting: 17.1±9.7%, and laying down: 36.2±11.0% of the day, trunk flexion: 10.3±4.7°; p<0.05). Moreover, LD patients demonstrated reduced balance and gait with increased sway (balance effort: 25.6±11.7°, walking: 0.8±0.3 m/s, sway: sagittal: 7.9±2.8°, coronal: 7.2±3.0°) compared to controls (balance effort: 14.6±5.7°, walking: 1.0±4.4 m/s, sway: sagittal: 5.8±2.5°, coronal: 3.2±1.3°; Figure 2). Strong correlations were found between wearable DFOMs to the PROMIS scores (r2 >0.55, p<0.05).

Discussion: Lumbar decompression and fusion have been demonstrated to decrease disability and improve function in patients with radicular pain caused by nerve root compression. A novel spine-specific wearable system was able to quantify the patient’s disability and functional level, with a good correlation to improvements reported in PROMs. A combination of disability and function outcome measurements (DFOMs) to supplement PROMs and radiographic measurements provides a more comprehensive evaluation of a spine patient’s health and assists physician planning treatment. It may also be possible for healthcare providers to view their patients' DFOMs in real-time, allowing them to monitor their progress and refine their patient care accordingly.

673a9518c4a17-W+Posy.JPG

  1. 1. Fehlings MG, Tetreault L, Nater A, et al. The Aging of the Global Population: The Changing Epidemiology of Disease and Spinal Disorders. Neurosurgery. 2015;77 Suppl 4:S1-5.
  2. 2. Haddas R, Lawlor M, Moghadam E, Fields A, Wood A. Spine patient care with wearable medical technology: state-of-the-art, opportunities, and challenges: a systematic review. Spine J. 2023;23(7):929-44.
  3. 3. Mobbs RJ, Fonseka RD, Natarajan P. Wearable sensor technology in spine care. Journal of Spine Surgery. 2021;8(1):84-6.
  4. 4. Chuan Yen T, Mohler J, Dohm M, Laksari K, Najafi B, Toosizadeh N. The Effect of Pain Relief on Daily Physical Activity: In-Home Objective Physical Activity Assessment in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients after Paravertebral Spinal Block. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(9).
  5. 5. Ghent F, Mobbs RJ, Mobbs RR, Sy L, Betteridge C, Choy WJ. Assessment and Post-Intervention Recovery After Surgery for Lumbar Disk Herniation Based on Objective Gait Metrics from Wearable Devices Using the Gait Posture Index. World Neurosurg. 2020;142:e111-e6.